The Treaty of Gravity: Negotiating With the Talking Heads
~ The Practice & The Decommodification of the Figure ~
Present-day society is trapped in an apprehensive, hyper-fast capitalist loop that treats everything—including art—as a predictable, standardized commodity.
To understand what we are losing, we can look to the philosopher Walter Benjamin. He described an object's “aura” as the feeling of a distinct, untouchable distance no matter how close we are to it. If you sit quietly on a late summer evening and watch the sun disappear beyond the horizon, you experience something of this aura. The sunset feels autonomous, beyond possession or manipulation. Ancient artifacts carry a similar presence. They do not feel mass-produced or politically manufactured. Their authority seems to arise from within themselves.
When a unique object is stripped of its physical texture, scale, and spatial presence, something essential disappears with it. What we encounter in a digital or mechanical reproduction is not the work itself, but a ghostly echo severed from the object’s original authority.
The Frame of Practice
Reproduction is not inherently harmful to art. Writers need books, musicians need recordings, and photographers need prints in order to share their work with a wider audience. Of course, hearing music performed live or listening to a poet speak in person carries a unforgettable experience. Yet reproduction still allows the original idea to travel meaningfully into the world.
But sculpture operates differently.
Physical works such as sculpture, assemblage, as well as in painting depend upon texture, scale, gravity, and spatial encounter. Without those conditions, the work loses much of its identity. A digital image of a sculpture can record it, but it cannot replace the physical experience of standing before it. The object’s weight, material resistance, and presence in space are inseparable from its meaning.
Historically, sculptors have always used tools to enlarge or reproduce forms. Greek and Roman workshops used calipers to transfer measurements from small models into marble. Renaissance masters relied upon apprentices to help execute monumental works. By the nineteenth century, artists such as Auguste Rodin employed mechanical enlargement devices like the pantograph. Yet even then, strict material and ethical boundaries remained in place.
Today those boundaries are collapsing.
The traditional boundaries are gone. The relationship between the viewer, the maker, and the object has shifted entirely. Modern commercial artists use 3D scans to turn a sculpture into an unlimited, infinite edition. Computer-guided machines mill forms from foam. Technicians coat it in clay, and the artist can quickly touchup the surface before mass-producing it. This technology is being deeply abused today by commercial artists.
Artists such as Jeff Koons have pushed this process into the center of contemporary commodity culture. When an artwork is reduced to a digital file, it turns into a sterile, mass-marketed commodity. The underlying geometry is mathematically perfect. It lacks the organic, enraptured by accidents of a piece built by human hands. It becomes a placeless decorative item competing on visual recognition alone.
To resist this loop, we must separate enlargement from replication.
If digital scanning is used to enlarge a work, the file should function exactly like a traditional maquette. Historically, a maquette was a small, raw model used to test an idea that could change and grow. It was a starting point for developing a thematic series, not a blueprint for cloning. Each final object should emerge through new material decisions, new physical negotiations, and the direct presence of the artist’s hand.
Likewise, when reproducing a cast sculpture—such as casting a fragile plaster or wax figure into permanent bronze—we must protect its true authenticity. It must be numbered and restricted as a limited edition, exactly like a printmaker does with a plate. Without these strict limits, the work ceases to be fine art. Bronze editions historically maintained hard numerical boundaries in order to preserve the integrity of the work. Once reproduction becomes endless, the sculpture risks collapsing into decoration and brand recognition alone.
Unlike endlessly cloned objects, direct carving and assemblage remain stubbornly tied to singular material histories. A stone carries fractures, density, weathering, and structural limitations that cannot be fully duplicated. My sculpture cannot be cloned or commodified very easily. Even though I consider most of my pieces as a maquette holding an idea, their final meaning is bound to the unique history of the material and the un-repeatable touch of my tools. Meaning emerges through negotiation with those realities.
How does sculpture anchor us so deeply? For me, the answer emerged through an unexpected dialogue between three worlds: the emotional force of Expressionism, the thermodynamic thinking of Willard Gibbs, and the embodied philosophy of Maurice Merleau-Ponty.
The Psychological Weight of Expressionism
Artists such as Edvard Munch and Alberto Giacometti understood that human emotion is never separate from physical space. Their figures do not merely occupy environments; they distort and charge them psychologically. Munch showed that our environment is never neutral. The space around a person can vibrate, scream, or isolate.
In my own assemblage, The Red Shoes, I tried to anchor this emotional tension physically. Instead of leaving the figure suspended inside an image, I embedded her within worn objects, weathered wood, and fragmented forms. The piece asks the viewer to confront emotion materially rather than consume it passively as an image on a screen.
This movement from psychological tension into physical presence leads naturally toward Giacometti. His elongated figures feel as though they are struggling simply to remain present against the threat of disappearance itself. My sculpture, “Yes (?)” exists in dialogue with this idea. Built from a highly textured type of petrified wood, balanced precariously upon a fragile base, her body appears grounded yet vulnerable, as though at any moment she might snap. (Photo to the left)
The Universal Rule of the Leap
When you stand in front of YES (?), you must look closely. Its splintered, coarse texture and fragile stance anchor you to the floor in a single, un-repeatable moment. This is where art transcends mere history. It shows that human feelings can be trapped inside the physical laws of the universe.
This is where the work of Willard Gibbs becomes unexpectedly meaningful for me as a sculptor. Gibbs understood that systems reveal themselves most powerfully at their boundaries—where forces, materials, and states interact. A few bold, abstract shapes can communicate the entire essence of a human being far more clearly than a hyper-realistic rendering ever could. Maurice Merleau-Ponty mirrors this in philosophy, arguing that our bodies understand the world through a direct, tactile relationship with matter.
The Ballet Dancer Metaphor
Imagine a ballet dancer crossing a darkened stage.
Under the theater lights, her body appears dense and concentrated against the fluid atmosphere surrounding it. As you move around the stage, her form constantly changes. From one angle she extends outward; from another she compresses into silhouette. The negative space around her shifts with every step you take.
Quantum physics offers a useful metaphor here. At the subatomic level, observation participates in how reality appears. Likewise, as a viewer moving around a sculpture, you are not simply consuming a static object. Your movement activates relationships between mass, shadow, balance, and space. The form continuously reorganizes itself through perception. In this moment, the viewer becomes the science of clarity holding onto the art itself.
As you circle a sculpture, the object changes shape—not because the stone itself moves, but because perception is weaving your living body into the silent history of the material. Sculpture ceases to be a passive commodity and becomes a living spatial negotiation between matter, gravity, and human awareness.
Willard Gibbs demonstrated that systems become most alive at their edges. I often think about this while looking at my sculpture “Uttered Silence”. The work is composed of two stone heads tilting toward one another in precarious equilibrium. Physically, they remain separate forms. Emotionally, they create a shared field of tension—a silence heavy with unspoken thought.
The rough volcanic texture mirrors the unstable terrain of human psychology itself. Thin black lines travel through existing fractures in the stone until mark and material begin cooperating together. The line becomes the rock, and the rock becomes the line.
The viewer also feels the sculpture structurally. Gravity presses downward while the hidden internal core pushes upward in resistance. The work holds itself in visible negotiation. Unlike mass-produced commodities whose value is assigned externally through price and branding, sculpture reveals value through its direct survival against gravity.
Understanding sculpture this way requires us to unlearn the passive laziness bred by contemporary art-commodities. While the mass-produced, shallow fabrications of the commercial art world demand nothing from us but a superficial glance and a price tag, a true sculpture demands our presence, exposing those prefab spectacles as empty mirrors that reflect nothing but financial greed.
The Stone Talking Back ~a Gibbsian Negotiation~
For a sculptor, feeling structurally and philosophically anchored in my own studio is everything—it transforms the physical strain of moving stone and wire into pure, directed momentum. When I enter my studio, the Talking Heads are watching me from all around. Sometimes I feel as though I’m interrupting. But when I settle in and begin speaking to them out loud, I acknowledge that these stones are not dead, passive objects waiting to be commodified. They possess a presence, an autonomy, and a history. They are active participants within the ecosystem of the studio.
My studio is not a place of passive production, but a space of vocal negotiation. The stone heads stacked around me become an audience and a sounding board. I sing to them like a botanist sings to her plants. Plants answer back by growing toward the light. My stone heads answer back through their physical constraints—their cracks, their stubborn weight, and their shifting centers of gravity. But it’s their light and shadows that speak to me mostly.
The sculpture is not born from a sudden flash of isolated human intellect, but from a slow dialogue between the artist’s hands and the presence of material. The works emerge through literal conversation—a negotiation with the material itself.
The Flesh of the World
Merleau-Ponty used the word Chiasm"--the Intertwining, to describe the moment the human body touches the world. When your hand touches a piece of stone, you are not just feeling the stone; the stone is actively pushing back against your hand. The boundary between the artist's mind and the object briefly dissolves.
I often think of this as “the gap” or the “in-between state” —the unstable threshold where abstract thought collides with physical matter. This moment is difficult to describe because it exists prior to language itself. It is tactile, intuitive, and bodily. It is where gravity, tension, perception, and imagination suddenly align.
Merleau-Ponty refers to this process as “thinking with your hands.” The sculpture isn’t a copy of an idea in an artist’s head; it is a temporary, intimate negotiation between idea, body, and matter. The “in-between state” is the moment our subconscious aligns with the physical laws of gravity and tension.
To escape the capitalist loop of turning everything into a commodity, we must learn to negotiate with the world rather than dominate it. We must slow down long enough to encounter material reality again. Perhaps quantum physics is reminding us that our “presence” participates in shaping the world we perceive.
So the next time you stand before a work of sculpture, remember Prospero in The Tempest—summoning form from a cloud of spirits while knowing that the moment we look away, the world may dissolve once again into pure potential.
©️Sherburn LaBelle
Published of Medium 06/12/2026
All Rights reserved.